Part 3 The Secret History of Mormonism: Period Two

August 25, 2015

 

The second period of Joseph Smith’s public ministry covers the 3 1/2 years that the fulness of the gospel was on the earth from June 5 1831 to December 5 1834.

During this time, Joseph Smith and others became sanctified and Joseph had his calling and election made sure, enabling him to offer an intercessory atonement offering for latter day Israel.

Ultimately, the Saints of the latter day restoration rejected the fulness of the gospel as per the prophecy of Jesus Christ in 3 Nephi 16, however, the intercessory atonement offering delayed the judgments of God until the 3rd watch and enables the final restoration of the fulness to take place after a “little season” of chastisement and learning.

Here is part three of the youtube series, The Secret History of Mormonism

This part of the series will make much more sense to you if you have watched the first two parts of the series.
Part One
Part Two

In this presentation I lament that I have not done more posts about how to use keyword searches to better understand doctrine during my nearly seven years of blogging. In the latest post by onewhoissearching he does a magnificent job of using scripture searching software to get to the bottom-line of what the holy word of God actually tells us about the doctrine of sealing.


The Controversy of Zion

October 1, 2013

In the 34th chapter of Isaiah, we are informed that when the indignation of the Lord falls upon the nations, it is referred to as the day of the Lord’s vengeance.

It is also described as the year of recompenses for the controversy of Zion.

I believe we are quickly approaching the great controversy that Isaiah speaks about.

Many people that have studied prophecy realize that virtually all prophecies have multiple fulfillments. One is a literal fulfillment while others are shadow fulfillments that are typological to the literal fulfillment.

I agree with this observation that was made on a prophecy website-

The Hebrew idea of prophecy is a pattern that is repeated, multiple fulfillments with one ultimate fulfillment. Each of the multiple fulfillments is both a type of, and a lesson on, the ultimate fulfillment

People who reject section 110 because they think the Elijah comes in the future need to understand that he did come and fulfill the prophecy in Malachi, AND, the prophecy will be fulfilled again, a second time in the end times.

More on that during this series. I plan on detailing what the true doctrine of Elijah really is and how it demonstrates just how true section 110 is. I guarantee it will raise a few eyebrows.

Getting back to the Controversy in Zion-

I believe there was a great controversy in Zion at the time of the succession crisis in Nauvoo when there was great debate and confusion over who the rightful successor to the prophet Joseph Smith was. I believe that controversy was very possibly a type of the controversy spoken of by Isaiah, only on a much smaller, narrower scale.

I am also open to the possibility that the great LDS google apostasy that has been spoken of in the media lately is bringing about another preliminary controversy, one that could very possibly be a sign of the impending return of God’s properly ordained and anointed servants back into the vineyard to bring about the redemption of Zion during the work of the Father.

Perhaps one of the most significant contributors to the Google apostasy is Denver Snuffer because of his controversial book, Passing the Heavenly Gift.

In the book, he does a remarkable job of accumulating and cataloguing much of the disruptive historical and doctrinal data that has been mined by numerous other authors and researchers over the last several decades. Because of the Internet, much of this information has been posted or paraphrased on the Internet for all to see, causing a crisis of faith for many Latter day Saints.

Much of what is in the book is accurate and valuable. Nevertheless, I have found numerous things that I feel are problematic.

The Redemption of Zion has been Predetermined

The book and the associated lectures being given, seem to promote the belief that the redemption of Zion will not literally take place the way that the Lord has promised it will,  in the parable of the redemption of Zion found in sections 101 and 103.

We have the unconditional promises from the Lord God of Israel that the voice of warning that will begin the Marvelous Work will be given by the Lords disciples that published the Book of Commandments and the Doctrine and Covenants.

When these servants return, they will go forth in the unstoppable power of the fulness of the priesthood.

The premise given in PTHG does not appear to support the unconditional promises in modern revelation, that assure us that Zion will be re-stablished on earth under the direction of first laborers of the last kingdom who have been properly ordained and anointed to do so. We have been promised that they will go forth for the last time  to  bind up the law and seal up the testimony, and to prepare the saints for the hour of judgment which is to come.

Rather, the book, and statements made by the author during his first lecture on Zion in Boise, seem to imply that inspired mortals will need to finish what Joseph started. Needless to say, I disagree with that premise. More importantly, I believe the scriptures disagree with it.

Joseph and his associates will finish the work that Joseph started under the divine guidance and power of the Lord God of Israel !

A Spike in Traffic

After I announced that I was going to provide a rebuttal on Passing the Heavenly Gift, the author of the book boldly put a link on his blog to my blog informing his followers that I would be doing a critique.

It appears that he is confident about what he has written and wants his readers to evaluate my critique .

This is consistent with a comment he once made wherein he encourages all of us to speak up and correct someone that is teaching false teachings.

It is reassuring to know that the author believes that we should all be vigilant in correcting each other when a false doctrine is presented, and is therefore supportive of my attempt to do so.  He believes that we each have an obligation to speak up when we see something false that is being propagated.

If there is an error in doctrine or practice, everyone has an obligation to speak up, from the least to the greatest. (D&C 20: 42, 46-47, 50-51, 59, among other places.)… Therefore, if someone should say something that is untrue or in error, then correct their doctrine, show the error

The link that he posted to my blog resulted in an obscene amount of traffic to my site as depicted below by my wordpress analytics graph.

snuffer stats

Within the first five days his site had sent 1734 unique visitors.

During that period of time, my site experienced over 7,200 views.

I point this out for two reasons.

Popularity Contest

One is that if people judge my rebuttal and any responses that the author might offer, based on who their favorite writer is, making the event a popularity contest, I will clearly be the looser! LOL

As you can see, my site normally only gets one or two hundred views per day.

That is pretty pathetic for a blog that has been around as long as mine has been around.

In my opinion, very few people can handle the bold truth that is contained in the scriptures that are highlighted on this blog.

I don’t sugar coat anything and I am not here to tickle anyone’s ears.

I don’t tell people that even though the church has been condemned, cursed and rejected with their dead, there is nothing to worry about because anyone can simply open the heavens and enjoy open communion with the Savior and legitimately expect to receive the second comforter even though the person is not living the fulness of the Gospel.

If you are here for a warm and fuzzy feeling, you are at the wrong site.

When you get done reading some of the articles on this site you may well be curled up in the fetal position whimpering like a little girl.

Nevertheless, if you persevere, you will find much reason to be hopeful because God, in his infinite wisdom, justice, and mercy, has provided a remedy for the awful situation we are in.

Are you ready for what is about to happen?

Interestingly, even now that the traffic has slowed way down to a trickle from his site to mine, I am still getting two to three times the volume I normally get in page views.

This is a good sign. It indicates to me that some of his followers are not mesmerized by the messenger but rather they want to discern the message.

They are open to hearing other points of view and want to make sure they test the doctrines in PTHG against the scriptures and the promptings of the Holy Ghost. They want to prove all things and hold fast to that which is good.

I appreciate the authors confidence and generosity in publicizing my intention to provide a rebuttal.

I hope he will provide another link on his blog when my final work of rebuttal is published.

The Possibility of a Huge Movement

The other point I want to make, with reference to the large amount of views that his blog generated for my blog, is that the following of loyal readers that the author has amassed, is formidable.

Clearly the number of his followers that actually follow his blog and clicked on the link represents only a small fraction of the readers of his book and the believers of the doctrines that he teaches.

If the approximately 2,000 people that he has sent to my site represents 10 percent of his following, that is 20,000 people!

I don’t know if 10% would represent a modest or liberal guestimation of his total readership, however, one can appreciate why the brethren labored with him so long, trying to do damage control.

There is a lot at stake here.

Consider the fact that the average person has a sphere of influence of about 98 friends, relatives and work associates that they associate relatively closely with. 20,000  times 98 is a significant influence that has the potential to grow exponentially.

You can see what a tremendous impact the author can have through his passionate followers that are sharing their beliefs with other friends and relatives.

This is why I feel I need to speak up and challenge some of the things in the book that I know to be erroneous.

Listing of Rebuttal Points

I have decided to post most of the rebuttal points that I will be addressing before I even address them.

I suppose that from a debate strategy point of view, what I am doing is foolish, but this is not about winning a debate. This is about exposing the truth and getting people engaged. I want the doctrinal teachings that I espouse to be just as challenged as the ones that I am challenging in the PTHG.

I want a lively discussion and debate. I am openly challenging the author of PTHG and/or any of his followers to test what I am saying if sound doctrinal arguments  against them can be brought forth.

Let the discussion begin and the truth prevail.

Salvation is at stake. We need to avoid being deceived.

The scriptures inform us that there are only two ways to avoid being deceived.

One is to treasure of the word of God in the scriptures.

The other is to take the Holy Ghost as our guide.

Most of the doctrinal rebuttal points that I will be addressing in future posts are listed at the end of this post to enable people to know what the main issues will be and to allow the author and his supporters to begin preparations for a response to each rebuttal point, should anyone choose to tender any.

I will be posting each rebuttal point in a separate blog post to enable everyone who is interested to comment and produce any evidence they desire to support and challenge my rebuttal.

I will not be allowing responses to the rebuttal points below, on this blog, until I have had the chance to complete the associated post on it, demonstrating what was taught in PTHG along with my corresponding evidence that disputes it.

Before I begin posting on each of the rebuttal points, I will present a post titled “priesthood Primer” that will help readers to better understand my first five rebuttals having to do with priesthood issues.

Following that post, I will begin addressing each of the individual rebuttals independently.

I am also going to produce a PDF that contains ALL of the rebuttal points and supporting evidence in one document. It will be posted on the Internet. The advantage of the PDF is two fold. First it provides one comprehensive article that contains all of the rebuttal topics and associated evidence. Secondly, it enables me to provide footnotes containing greater context and clarification.

The online PDF will be a work in process that will be updated as more documentation is added from any comments that are made on each post. I will show the current “version” under the heading so that people will know if there have been updates.

If I am ever convinced that one of my rebuttal points is without merit, and has been adequately debunked by the author or anyone else, I will humbly apologize, eat a little crow, remove it from the PDF, and crawl under a rock and hide for a few days to hide my profuse shame and embarrassment for having made a doctrinal mistake and demonstrating that I am human and fallible. LOL

 Conversely, if commenters bring up valid and compelling points of rebuttal that I missed, I will add them to the debate as well, and to the PDF.

By the time the blog series is finished, the PDF will be hopefully be finished as well.

Naturally, it is not just the doctrines contained in PTHG that are on trial here.

Many of the doctrines contained in PTHG are just rehashed  and in some cases, re-spun doctrines that have been or are currently taught in the corporate church.

Hence, many doctrines taught by the corporate church are also being challenged in these rebuttals.

The listing of some of the upcoming rebuttal points are listed below-

Is an honest Rebuttal Possible?
Weighing the Doctrines Postulated in Passing the Heavenly Gift

Rebuttal Point #1: Joseph Smith was Instrumental in Restoring Three Priesthoods not just Two

Rebuttal Point #2: Peter James and John did NOT restore the Melchizedek Priesthood in 1829, the Lord restored the Melchizedek Priesthood in 1831

Rebuttal Point #3: The Patriarchal Priesthood is NOT the “third order of the Priesthood”

Rebuttal Point #4: The First High Priests were ordained in June of 1831 NOT June of 1832

Rebuttal Point #5: Priesthood IS necessary to officiate in the Ordinances of Salvation

Rebuttal Point #6 The Twelve do NOT have Equal Authority with the First Presidency in Governing the Church

Rebuttal Point #7 Hyrum was NOT just next in line at the time of the martyrdom, He WAS the Sole Prophet

Rebuttal Point #8 It WAS clearly documented who the Lord had Previously Conferred the Keys On at the time of the Martyrdom

Rebuttal Point #9 It WAS Rigdon’s Right to Claim Leadership in Joseph’s Absence

Rebuttal Point #10 Section 132 could NOT have been received as early as 1829

Rebuttal Point #11 The Book of Mormon does NOT necessarily reaffirm that the rejected Gentile Church will remain part of God’s Plan leading up to the New Jerusalem

Rebuttal Point #12 The Doctrine and Covenants DOES clearly Detail When and Why the Fulness was Lost

Rebuttal Point #13 The First 33 verses of section 132 ARE about Polygamy

Rebuttal Point #14 The Book of Abraham was NOT translated in 1842

Rebuttal Point #15 Joseph Did NOT Receive a Revelation about Blacks and the Priesthood after ordaining Elijah Able

Rebuttal Point #16 The Masonic Temple endowment is NOT part of the pure and simple Gospel of Jesus Christ

Rebuttal Point #17 After the Gentile Rejection, the Remnant of the Book of Mormon was NOT given the Fulness

Rebuttal Point #18 The Fulness of the Gospel is NOT available when God Rejects the Church with its Dead

Rebuttal Point #19 The Church HAS Changed the Ordinances of the Gospel

Rebuttal Point #20 Rigdon is NOT the Reason the Restored Church had an objective of restoring the pattern of the New Testament Church

Rebuttal Point #21 The Gospel Law of Marriage in Section 132 Categorically Contradicts the Gospel Law of Marriage in section 42. Reject the Law of the Gospel contained in section 42 at your Peril!

Rebuttal Point #22 Zion can only be established by Those Who Have Been Appointed

Rebuttal Point #23 What Constitutes a Testimony?

Rebuttal Point #24 Elijah Did come AND Will Come

Rebuttal Point #25 Section 110 IS a true Event that Literally Took Place as Described. The Evidence is beyond Overwhelming.

The gospel of Jesus Christ is true.
The Marvelous Work is about to begin.
Praise God.

The Savior in Kirtland (Part Four)

February 24, 2013

The Savior in Kirtland
By Karl Anderson

Book Review and Critique by OWIW
OneWhoIsWatching [at] gmail.com
Part Four

In part 3 of this series we reviewed the fact that according to Karl Anderson, there is no credible documentation to suggest that anyone saw Christ during the solemn assembly at the Kirtland Temple, despite the fact that one of the primary purposes and expectations of the event was for the pure in heart to see him.

Even though the dedicatory prayer was petitioning God the Father to accept the temple, during the dedicatory prayer, strangely enough, the apostle Peter came and accepted it without being seen by most people in attendance. It is primarily through the testimony of Joseph Smith that we know that Peter accepted the temple.

It may seem a little strange that the saints are petitioning the Father to accept the house, yet Peter comes to accept it during the solemn assembly, and  Christ comes to accept it a week later when Joseph and Oliver received a special endowment in the holy place behind the veil.

I would submit to you that the Father will yet accept it, in the upper court, in the third watch, when the fulness of priesthood power is restored to the earth.

It actually makes perfect sense.

The Father will accept it in the 3rd watch, when the fulness of the priesthood is restored and God’s High Priests returns to the power that they had previously lost (Isa 11 and D&C 113)

In part 3 of this review, we covered the fact that the solemn assembly on March 27th was an epic failure in contrast to what the saints were expecting to happen.

Instead of the high priests receiving the “Promise of the Father” and the “endowment of power” (which appears to begin what  the Book of Mormon refers to as the “work of the Father“), and enables the true apostle/high priests to go forth for the last time to gather the elect and redeem Zion, no endowment of power appears to have materialized during the solemn assembly.

From that standpoint, the solemn assembly was a grand “fizzle” as characterized by David Whitmer, based on the expectations of the saints and the conditional promises God had made regarding the event.

Many of the saints left the solemn assembly feeling somewhat sobered and disappointed by the fact that they were collectively unworthy to see Christ and receive the blessings they had anticipated. Nevertheless, historical revisionism has altered the official history of the church causing most Latter day Saints to believe that the experience at the dedication of the Kirtland Temple exceeded the one experienced by the New Testament Saints as documented in the book of Acts.

The ushering in of the dispensation of the fulness of times did not take place during that preliminary solemn assembly, as anticipated. Instead, the Lord came to his temple in secret, seven days later. At that time, He, and other ministering angels ushered in an ancient, preparatory dispensation, even the dispensation of the Gospel of Abraham. Isaiah characterized the gospel of Abraham as the gospel of “former things“.

This time, seven days later,  it would be Christ that would come and declare the temple was accepted;

Behold, I have accepted this house and my name shall be here..

Notice that the promise was that Christ’s name shall (come time in the future) be upon the temple.

Manifestations of the Spirit Withheld from the Unconsecrated

The reason the saints could not enjoy the full pentecostal out pouring of the spirit that they anticipated during the solemn assembly is explained in simplicity in section 70:

..in your temporal things you shall be equal, and this not grudgingly, otherwise the abundance of the manifestations of the Spirit shall be withheld

Clearly, the saints had failed to live consecration and become temporally equal by the time the temple was finished and the solemn assembly was ready to be conducted. The manifestations of the spirit were therefore withheld.

The Manifestations of the Spirit NOT Fully Withheld from Joseph and Oliver

We know the abundance of the manifestations of the spirit were withheld from the congregation during the solemn assembly on March 27, in part, because they had failed to consecrate.

We know the manifestations of the spirit were withheld also from the priesthood leaders assembled in the outer court on the other side of the veil, on April 3rd.

But why were Joseph and Oliver allowed to enjoy the manifestations of the spirit to the extent that they saw Christ and were visited by ministering angels?

Because they had not transgressed the law of “tithing” (consecration).

In a previous  post we have addressed the fact that when the saints stopped attempting consecration, Joseph and Oliver entered into a Covenant of “tithing” (consecration) for the continuance of “blessings. (See DHC 2:174-175.)

While most of the condemned church was under the law of mercy in the Kirtland Temple, Joseph and Oliver were still under the law of grace and able to enjoy gospel blessings including a visitation of Christ and the ministering of angels.

Although Joseph and Oliver did receive an endowment, it was apparently not the great, final, Melchizedek endowment of power from on high. It appears to have been a preparatory endowment. (That, or, they received the greater endowment and it remained dormant, pending the fulfillment of their intercessory act and the arrival of the appointed time)

It appears as if the visitation had something to do with the beginning of the literal fulfillment of the prophetic enactment contained in the ancient atonement statute and the ushering in of the dispensation of the ancient gospel of Abraham. It is obvious that other things happened and were revealed beside the short summary contained in section 110.

This appearance from the Savior was a direct fulfillment of Christ’s proclamation at Zions Camp, in section 105:33:

It is expedient in me that the first elders  of my church should receive their endowment from on high in my house..

(Joseph had been designated as the 1st Elder of the Church and Oliver had been designated as the 2nd Elder of the Church)

Christ’s Appearance Kept Secret From the Saints

It appears that Christ must have forbidden Joseph and Oliver from speaking about this secret event in public. There is no documentation to indicate the Joseph or Oliver ever did speak of it in public during the rest of their lives.

As one begins to understand what really took place during that event, it becomes apparent why Joseph and Oliver did not want to speak about it.

Since the great endowment of power did not take place among the high priests that had been called and anointed to receive it, and the dispensation of the fulness of times and the marvelous work could not begin at that time, what in the world was the church supposed to do now?

AWKWARD!

The called and chosen high priests thought they were poised and ready to go into all the world to prune the vineyard for the last time, pending the endowment of power, but they were apparently unworthy of the necessary endowment of power from on high!

Clearly the saints seemed to be at a stand still. The Lord did not command the high priests to go forth in power to gather the elect following the solemn assembly. Rather, the “elders” that had not been been endowed with power were told that they would be going forth.

In the middle of the week between the solemn assembly and the visitation of Christ, Joseph made the following declaration:

I made the following remarks, that the time that we were required to tarry in Kirtland to be endued would be fulfilled in a few days, and then the Elders would go forth and each must stand for himself..

Strangely, directly following the events of that week, Joseph did not direct anyone to go forth preaching the gospel.

The Bank Failure and Defiling of the Temple

Shortly after the eight days of events in the Kirtland Temple, a darkness fell upon the saints in Kirtland.

In January of 1837 the Kirtland Safety Society was organized. By November of that year it had failed and several leaders of the church had become estranged from the church and a huge apostasy of the church ensued.

Joseph’s Mother, Lucy Mack Smith documented an experience that happened following the dedication of the Kirtland Temple which personifies the darkness that descended upon the saints:

Shortly after the completion of the house, Joseph and Martin Harris took a short tour through the eastern country. When they arrived at Palmyra, on their return, Joseph had a vision, which lasted until he besought the Lord to take it from him; for it manifested to him things which were painful to contemplate. It was taken from before his eyes for a short time, but soon returned again, and remained until the whole scene was portrayed before him.

On his arrival at home, the brethren seemed greatly pleased to see him. The next day he preached a sermon, and the following is a part of his remarks:

‘Brethren, I am rejoiced to see you, and I have no doubt but that you are glad to see me. We are now nearly as happy as we can be on earth. We have accomplished more than we had any reason to expect when we began. Our beautiful house is finished, and the Lord has acknowledged it, by pouring out His Spirit upon us here, and revealing to us much of His will in regard to the work which He is about to perform.

Furthermore, we have everything that is necessary for our comfort and convenience, and, judging from appearances, one would not suppose that anything could occur which would break up our friendship for each other, or disturb our tranquility. But, brethren, beware; for I tell you in the name of the Lord, that there is an evil in this very congregation, which, if not repented of, will result in setting many of you (who are here this day) so much at enmity against me, that you will have a desire to take my life, and you even would do it, if God should permit the deed.

But, brethren, I now call upon you to repent, and cease all your hardness of heart, and turn from those principles of death and dishonesty which you are harboring in your bosoms, before it is eternally late, for there is yet room for repentance.’

He continued to labor with them in this way, appealing to them in the most solemn manner until almost everyone in the house was in tears, and he was exhausted with speaking.

In the fall of 1836, a bank was established in Kirtland. Soon after the sermon, above mentioned, Joseph discovered that a large amount of money had been taken away by fraud, from this bank. He immediately demanded a search warrant of Esquire F. G. Williams, which was flatly refused.

‘I insist upon a warrant,’ said Joseph, ‘for if you will give me one, I can get the money, and if you do not, I will break you of your office.’ ‘Well, break it is, then,’ said Williams, ‘and we will strike hands upon it.’ ‘Very well,’ said Joseph, ‘from henceforth I drop you from my quorum, in the name of the Lord.’

Joseph then went to Cleveland, in order to transact some business pertaining to the bank; and as he was absent the ensuing Sunday, my husband preached to the people. In speaking of the bank affair, he reflected somewhat sharply upon Warren Parrish. Although the reflection was just, Parrish was highly incensed, and made an attempt to drag him out of the stand.

My husband appealed to Oliver Cowdery, who was justice of the peace, to have him brought to order; but Oliver never moved from his seat. William seeing the abuse which his father was receiving, sprang forward and caught Parrish, and carried him in his arms nearly out of the house.

At this John Boynton stepped forward, and drawing a sword from his cane, presented it to William’s breast, and said, ‘if you advance one step further, I will run you through.’ Before William had time to turn himself, several gathered around who threatened to handle him severely, if he should lay the weight of his finger upon Parrish again. At this juncture of affairs, I left the house, not only terrified at the scene, but likewise sick at heart, to see that the apostasy of which Joseph had prophesied, was so near at hand.”

History of the Prophet Joseph, by his Mother, Lucy Smith, pp. 211-213.

A similar reminiscence from Eliza R. Snow confirms this event:

During the time my brother was on this, his first mission, a great change had been going on in Kirtland, in the midst of the Saints. A spirit of speculation had crept into the hearts of some of the Twelve, and nearly, if not every quorum was more or less infected. Most of the Saints were poor, and now prosperity was dawning upon them—the Temple was completed, and in it they had been recipients of marvelous blessings, and many who had been humbled and faithful to the performance of every duty—ready to go and come at every call of the Priesthood, were getting haughty in their spirits, and lifted up in the pride of their hearts. As the Saints drank in the love and spirit of the world, the Spirit of the Lord withdrew from their hearts, and they were filled with pride and hatred toward those who maintained their integrity. They linked themselves together in an opposing party pretended that they constituted the Church, and claimed that the Temple belonged to them, and even attempted to hold it.

“Warren Parrish, who had been a humble, successful preacher of the Gospel, was the ringleader of this apostate party. One sabbath morning, he, with several of his party, came into the Temple armed with pistols and bowie-knives, and seated themselves together in the Aaronic pulpits, on the east end of the Temple, while Father Smith and others, as usual, occupied those of the Melchizedek Priesthood on the west.

Soon after the usual opening services, one of the brethren on the west stand arose, and just after he commenced to speak, one on the east interrupted him. Father Smith, presiding, called to order—he told the apostate brother that he should have all the time he wanted, but he must wait his turn—as the brother On the west took the floor and commenced first to speak, he must not be interrupted.

A fearful scene ensued—the apostate speaker becoming so clamorous, that Father Smith called for the police to take that man out of the house, when Parrish, John Boynton, and others, drew their pistols and bowie-knives, and rushed down from the stand into the congregation; J. Boynton saying he would blow out the brains of the first man who dared to lay hands on him.

Many in the congregation, especially women and children, were terribly frightened—some tried to escape from the confusion by jumping out of the windows.

Amid screams and shrieks, the policemen, in ejecting the belligerents, knocked down a stovepipe, which fell helter-skelter among the people; but, although bowie-knives and pistols were wrested from their owners, and thrown hither and thither to prevent disastrous results, no one was hurt, and after a short, but terrible scene to be enacted in a Temple of God, order was restored, and the services of the day proceeded as usual.”

A huge apostasy of the church took place during this time.

A solution was coming.

Something New Must Be Done

On June 4th 1837, over a year after the anticipated global missionary work and gathering should have been begun in power, Joseph finally declared that “..God revealed to me that something new must be done for the salvation of the Church“. (HC 2:487-89, May-June 1837.)

At that time the Prophet Joseph Smith announced to Elder Heber C. Kimball of the Quorum of the Twelve that, “The Spirit of the Lord has whispered to me, ‘let my servant Heber go to England and proclaim my gospel and open the door of salvation to that nation

Others of the twelve were called to help open up foreign missions shortly after that.

Interestingly, instead of the Lord commanding the anointed high priests to go forth in power, baptizing and having the fruits following those that believe, He commands the condemned quorum of the Twelve to PROMULGATE the gospel and bear witness of his name.

Look at the fascinating verbiage used in the following passage:

“And next spring let them depart to go over the great waters, and there promulgate my gospel, the fulness thereof, and bear record of my name.” (section 118)

This is what the 1828 Websters defines the word promulgate:

PROMUL’GATE, v.t. [L. promulgo.] To publish; to make known by open declaration; as, to promulgate the secrets of a council. It is particularly applied to the publication of laws and the gospel. The moral law was promulgated at mount Sinai. The apostles promulgated the gospel. Edicts, laws and orders are promulgated by circular letters, or through the medium of the public prints.

That opened up the publishing and declaring of the gospel to the nations of the earth by those who were NOT called and chosen and endowed.

Compare the above mandate given to the condemned quorum of the twelve, to the  mandate that will be given in the 3rd watch to the apostleshigh priestsfriends of God, in the 3rd watch, who are endowed with power from on high:

Therefore, go ye into all the world; and unto whatsoever place ye cannot go ye shall send, that the testimony may go from you into all the world unto every creature.
63  And as I said unto mine apostles, even so I say unto you, for you are mine apostles, even God’s high priests; ye are they whom my Father hath given me; ye are my friends;
64  Therefore, as I said unto mine apostles I say unto you again, that every soul who believeth on your words, and is baptized by water for the remission of sins, shall receive the Holy Ghost.
65  And these signs shall follow them that believe—
66  In my name they shall do many wonderful works;
67  In my name they shall cast out devils;
68  In my name they shall heal the sick;
69  In my name they shall open the eyes of the blind, and unstop the ears of the deaf;
70  And the tongue of the dumb shall speak;
71  And if any man shall administer poison unto them it shall not hurt them;
72  And the poison of a serpent shall not have power to harm them.
73  But a commandment I give unto them, that they shall not boast themselves of these things, neither speak them before the world; for these things are given unto you for your profit and for salvation.
74  Verily, verily, I say unto you, they who believe not on your words, and are not baptized in water in my name, for the remission of their sins, that they may receive the Holy Ghost, shall be damned, and shall not come into my Father’s kingdom where my Father and I am.

Clearly, there is a distinction between publishing the written word containing the fulness of the gospel vs. preaching and baptizing people into the fulness of the gospel covenant in power.

Those who are baptized by those who are endowed with power from on high and who have been “ordained and sealed unto power” (76:52), will have miracles and signs that will bear witness of the true power of the priesthood.

The commission of the condemned quorum on the other hand, began the fulfillment of the prophecy by Christ in 3rd Nephi.

As predicted, the believing LDS Gentiles would first reject the fulness of the gospel, then they would take the published KNOWLEDGE of the gospel to the House of Israel during the dispensation of the Gospel of Abraham. (see 3 Nephi 6:10-12)

Following that, the called and chosen gentiles will return in the 3rd watch, become endowed, and then go forth in power.

Final Observations of the Book

Having provided what I feel is some very important context for what happened following the dedication of the Kirtland temple, I will now share the remainder of my observations that I had reading Karl’s book.

Contained at the end of this post will be a spreadsheet showing numerous keywords to other prophecies embedded in the dedicatory prayer for the Kirtland Temple.

Also contained at the end of this post will be a link to a document containing a brief chronology of events and declarations pertaining to the rest of the story regarding the restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood and the final results of my search for the mysterious 23 high priests. (these documents will hopefully be embedded in this post within a week of when it is first published)

I am now of the opinion that the full number of high priests that were called, chosen and faithful to begin the redemption of Zion is 24.  The reason that God did not call 24 high priests at the Morley Farm is because Oliver Cowdery was unable to attend the meeting. He was the first one ordained following the meeting, making him the 24th high priest to be ordained.

I believe these brethren represent the number of high priests that will initially return and receive power to begin the great work. Unfortunately, not all of the initial 24 that were called at the Morley Farm, were chosen. Therefore, those that fell from their calling, were replaced. The final quorum of 24 high priests who are called, chosen and faithful, will return and go forth in power to help usher in the fulness of times, burn up the wicked, help to gather the elect and redeem Zion.

Observation 11-

11- Pillar of light where baptisms were taking place

One of the things I appreciated about Karl’s book is the fact that he had some really fun, faith promoting trivia about some of the early spiritual phenomena that took place in Kirtland, particularly during the really early days of the church, before it became condemned for taking the scriptures lightly.

It is fun to be reminded that many people were converted because of miracles and prophecies that were fulfilled. It is also very instructive to realize that many of the saints that came into the church because of the miracles, eventually left the church at a later time. Conversion needs to be based on the firm foundation of the witness of the Holy Ghost, not based on outwards signs and wonders.

One great example of the the spiritual phenomena that was not uncommon during the early days of the restoration has to do with the pillar of light that shown down upon the sacred place where the saints were baptizing new converts:

There were many signs and wonders seen in the heavens.. both by Saints and strangers. A pillar of light was seen every evening for more than a month hovering over the pace where we did our baptizing. One evening.. the moon was not to be seen that night Although it was cloudy, it was as light as noonday, and we could seemingly see .. farther that night than we could in the day time” (pg 148 account given by Philo Dibble)

12- 23 High Priests were ordained to the newly restored Melchizedek Priesthood

It is amazing to me how LDS historians, scholars and General Authorities downplay the importance of and the meaning behind the amazing special conference at the Morley Farm and the calling of the first 23 High Priests.

When I first saw the secret document in Kirtland telling about the Morley Farm and the 23 people called to be High Priests I immediately dug out my copy of “Joseph Smith’s Kirtland” to see what it said about this historical event. I couldn’t believe I had missed this chapter of the book.

To my utter surprise and amazement, there was no chapter in the book pertaining to it. Yet I was reasonably sure that Karl was the one who wrote the secret document about the event that I had obtained in Kirtland years later.

If that is the case, he and his close confidants were very much aware of the significance of the secret conference and were pondering those events in secret while he did not want to give it much notice in his book.

Regardless of whether Karl was the author of the mysterious document or not, he certainly must have been very familiar with the events of the special conference, detail by detail.

I can only assume that Karl had intentionally left that information out of the book because it was controversial, not very faith promoting, and difficult to understand.

It frankly contradicts what the church currently teaches about priesthood.

Anyway… one of the reasons I was excited to purchase Karl’s latest book on Kirtland was to see if he would address the special conference at the Morley Farm in his new book.

Astoundingly, he again, didn’t say much more in his new book than he did in his first book.

And what he did say simply noted the accounts of people seeing the Father and the Son. Very little else was said beside the man of sin appearing. He did not emphasize or give credence to the fact that Joseph characterized the event as the first time that the Melchizedek priesthood was restored to the earth.

This was one of the my greatest disappointments in the book.

To add insult to injury, Karl obscures the true number of people called to be High Priests.

Firstly, he conveniently declines to mention how many men were ordained to the Melchizedek Priesthood in the main body of the book.

In the footnotes, he lists each of them by name (enabling anyone who takes the time to count them to see that there are 23)

Then he make the following declaration in the main body of his book:

“Lyman Wight, Harvey Whitlock, and Joseph Smith saw both the Father and the Son as the first high priest were ordained at the fourth conference of the Church.  During the meeting at least twenty-two high priests and other ordained members witnessed outward manifestations of glory and power emanating from the vision.”

What a strange thing to say!

at least 22 of the first high priests and other ordained members witnessed outward manifestations…

Go figure!

He lists all 23 newly ordained High Priests by name in the footnotes, but says in the main body of the book that at least 22 high priests were present to witness the outward manifestations.

The clear intent is to avoid assigning an exact figure to the number of high priests called and ordained and to obscure the exact number of people called to be High Priests by highlighting a lesser number than 23.

Was one of the newly ordained High Priests outside in the woods taking a leak when the outward manifestations were taking place?

I hardly think so.

The unspoken, but obvious implication here, in my opinion, is that Karl, like other apologists, is downplaying the legitimacy of Martin Harris’ ordination to be a high priest because he had not yet been ordained an elder.

The fact that Martin had only been ordained to the Aaronic priesthood and yet was called and ordained to be a high priest without ever needing to be ordained to the priesthood that had been restored by the apostle Peter, proves Brigham Young and the Modern Church to be in error about the true nature of what really took place at the Morley Farm.

It clearly shows that these men were not just being ordained to an “office” in the existing priesthood that had previously been restored by Peter James and John.

The calling of Martin Harris as a High Priest, proves that Joseph’s declaration that the Melchizedek priesthood was restored for the first time at the special conference at the Morley Farm was true and accurate.

There are clearly three separate and distinct orders of the priesthood instead of two!

It is difficult to understand why the church even tries to obscure these things because Andrew Ehat clearly documents the three distinct levels of priesthood in the “Words of Joseph smith” as does President Joseph Fielding Smith in “Teaching of the Prophet Joseph Smith”.

  • Aaronic restored by John the Baptist
  • Patriarchal restored by Peter James and John
  • Melchizedek Restored by the voice of God from Heaven

Clearly, Joseph Smith clearly taught about the three levels of priesthood authority.

13- Only  High Priests were admitted into the school of the prophets

It appears that there was a distinct difference between the school of the elders and the school of the Prophets in Kirtland.

Furthermore, there was a clear class distinction between those high priests who were being trained to be prophets and those elders who were not. Karl notes the historical assembly in which the school when the high priests were organized according to revelation:

On March 18 1833 a council of High priests assembled in the school of the prophets and were organized according to revelation… at this gathering , Sidney Rigdon and Frederick Williams were ordained to take part with me in holding the keys of the last kingdom…” (ref section 90)  pag 178

It is important to understand that an elder that is ordained to be an apostle, does not complete his calling as an apostle until he has been ordained a High Priest and received of the fulness thereof to preach in power. Elder Brigham Young and some of his brethren of the twelve were not ordain High Priests and were not allowed into the school of the prophets.

14 – One must see the Father and Son to be true Apostles

It becomes apparent from the scriptures and the history of the church that seeing a vision of the Savior did not constitute the same magnitude of a testimony as did seeing both the Father and the Son.

Here is an amazing declaration from Joseph Smith that Karl provides in his book.

Brethren, now you are prepared to be the apostles of Jesus Christ for you have seen both the Father and the Son and know that they exist and that they are two separate personages.”   pg 183

According to Zebedee Coltrin, that is what Joseph Smith said to the members of the school of the prophets after they saw the Father and the Son. (several years before the Kirtland Temple was completed.)

The nature and character of God and the mystical doctrine of the Godhead is something we have already covered in other posts.

Clearly there is only one God who is mystically composed of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. The Father is a personage of spirit and glory. The Son is a personage of physical tabernacle. The spirit of the Father mystically dwells within the Son and the tabernacle of the Son mystically dwells within the Father and they constitute the only true God.

Nevertheless, these three aspects of the only true God can and do manifest themselves separately at times. According to Joseph Smith, this mystery must be revealed to an elder in order to consummate his full apostleship.

I would be happy to explain the mystery of Godliness in greater detail and clarity but I have not seen the Father and the Son, so, no can do.

15 – Karl declares that the Savior appeared in the temple in at least 8 different visions and the Father and Son appeared in four different visions (pg 228) 

After comparing the solemn assembly to the day of Pentecost in the New Testament, Karl emphasizes that there are three different visions where the Savior appears in the Kirtland Temple. He also points out that the Father and the Son appear in four different visions in the Kirtland Temple.

He is building the case that the kirtland Temple and more specifically the eight days beginning with the solemn assembly and ending with the appearance of the Savior seven days later represented the spiritual high point of the restoration.

In the words of Karl Anderson:

April 3 1836 might be considered a pinnacle of the Restoration” pg 306)

Upon close scrutiny however, it should be noted that with the sole exception of the appearance of Christ to Joseph and Oliver on April 3rd:

ALL OF THE VISIONS OF CHRIST AND THE FATHER TOOK PLACE IN THE TEMPLE BEFORE IT WAS DEDICATED AND BEFORE THE SOLEMN ASSEMBLY.

(all of those visions were of a higher spiritual manifestation that the appearance of Christ and angels)

FURTHER, JOSEPH SMITH AND OLIVER COWDERY ARE THE ONLY PEOPLE CLEARLY AND SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS HAVING THESE PRELIMINARY MANIFESTATIONS.

This is very important to understand because the sanitized history of the church leads people to believe that the solemn assembly at the Kirtland Temple and the appearance of Christ seven days later was the apex or high point of the spiritual phenomena that took place in Kirtland.

The truth is that the apex of spiritual phenomena had come and gone in Kirtland before the Temple was completed and before the dedication of the temple.

The revised history of the Church leads one to believe that the events taking place during the solemn assembly and the following seven days were Melchizedek in nature when in fact they were patriarchal in nature at best. ( they had to do with the “everlasting gospel” not the “fulness of the gospel”)

Again, it is important to remember that a vision of Christ is probably not the same level of revelation as the literal appearance of the Father and the Son.

In other wards, unlike the literal appearance of the Father and Son to Joseph and Sidney in section 76, where Joseph and Sidney were transfigured and saw both the Father and the Son, and spoke with the Son, which was undoubtedly a Melchizedek priesthood event, the event in the Kirtland Temple where Joseph and Oliver were visited by Christ and angels, and given an ancient dispensation, was not a Melchizedek priesthood event. rather, it appears to have been a patriarchal/evangelical priesthood event or even an Aaronic event. (it is interesting to not that according to section 13, the keys of the Aaronic Priesthood contain the ability to be ministered by angels. The is what happened in section 110)

16- The 15 High Priests that were Called and Chosen

Ok, I have mentioned in other posts how grateful I am to Karl for giving me the Ah ha! moment when he brought to my attention what happened concerning the restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood at the special conference at the Morley Farm and the calling of the 23 high priests.

Karl gave me another Ah ha! moment in his new book.

In the book, Karl directs our attention to the following passages and declarations from the Lord at Zions Camp as documented in section 105:

26  Now, behold, I say unto you, my friends, in this way you may find favor in the eyes of the people, until the army of Israel becomes very great.
27  And I will soften the hearts of the people, as I did the heart of Pharaoh, from time to time, until my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., and mine elders, whom I have appointed, shall have time to gather up the strength of my house,
30  And after these lands are purchased, I will hold the armies of Israel guiltless in taking possession of their own lands, which they have previously purchased with their moneys, and of throwing down the towers of mine enemies that may be upon them, and scattering their watchmen, and avenging me of mine enemies unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me.
31  But first let my army become very great, and let it be sanctified before me, that it may become fair as the sun, and clear as the moon, and that her banners may be terrible unto all nations;
32  That the kingdoms of this world may be constrained to acknowledge that the kingdom of Zion is in very deed the kingdom of our God and his Christ; therefore, let us become subject unto her laws.
33  Verily I say unto you, it is expedient in me that the first elders of my church should receive their endowment from on high in my house, which I have commanded to be built unto my name in the land of Kirtland.
34  And let those commandments which I have given concerning Zion and her law be executed and fulfilled, after her redemption.
35  There has been a day of calling, but the time has come for a day of choosing; and let those be chosen that are worthy.
36  And it shall be manifest unto my servant, by the voice of the Spirit, those that are chosen; and they shall be sanctified;
37  And inasmuch as they follow the counsel which they receive, they shall have power after many days to accomplish all things pertaining to Zion.
38  And again I say unto you, sue for peace, not only to the people that have smitten you, but also to all people;
39  And lift up an ensign of peace, and make a proclamation of peace unto the ends of the earth;
40  And make proposals for peace unto those who have smitten you, according to the voice of the Spirit which is in you, and all things shall work together for your good.
41  Therefore, be faithful; and behold, and lo, I am with you even unto the end.  Even so.  Amen.

To more fully appreciate what is being said above, you need to re-read the parable of the redemption of Zion in section 101.

As you can see, in the passages above, God is referring to the parable of the redemption of Zion contained in section 101 of the Doctrine and Covenants.

In those passages he explains that Joseph and Oliver, the first elders need to receive an endowment in the house of the Lord in Kirtland which was yet to be built.

He then points out that there has been a day of CALLING (beginning with the restoration of the priesthood at the Morley Farm)

But now it is time for the faithful among those who have been CALLED to be CHOSEN! (see also section 95:5)

He then promised that the faithful will be CHOSEN by God according to the VOICE OF THE SPIRIT through Joseph Smith and they will be SANCTIFIED.

Karl then reveals that, THAT EVENT ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE THE FOLLOWING DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JOSEPH SMITH HAD A REVELATION THE NEXT DAY IDENTIFYING 15 ELDERS WHO WERE NOT ONLY CALLED BUT ALSO CHOSEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ah ha!
Ah ha!
Ah ha!

I had not known this because Joseph Smith was very sneaky and did not canonize that revelation.

It eventually became very obscure.

This canonized revelation that was given the following day, on June 23rd 1834, contains the key to searching out the rest of the story regarding the restoration of the priesthood at the Morley Farm. It explains in greater detail exactly who replaced the unfaithful brethren that were called to the Melchizedek Priesthood at the Morley Farm!

It contains detailed information about who the key individuals were that will play a part in returning in power to gather the elect, destroy the wicked and redeem Zion!!!!!

In the document that I am going to eventually embed in this post, I will provide commentary about that revelation.

(Karl mentions this obscure revelation on pg 253)

It is interesting to note that 9 of the 15 men “chosen” by God, by revelation at Zion’s Camp, had previously been ordained to the Melchizedek priesthood at the Morley Farm while six of them had since been ordained to be High Priests…

The revelation can be found online at http://web.archive.org/web/20111012005209/http://saintswithouthalos.com/m/340623.phtml

Part of it can be found at this link as well.

http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/minutes-23-june-1834

This concludes this book review of Karl Anderson’s new book titled: “The Savior in Kirtland

I love and appreciate Karl and I am very grateful for his efforts to present so much important information about the LDS restoration during the Kirtland years. He has clearly been inspired to do the work he has done.

On a related note, I would point out that the dedicatory prayer as documented in section 109 of the D&C probably contains more references to ancient and modern prophecies pertaining to the past and future prophetic events in Kirtland than any other revelation in the Doctrine and Covenants.

It appears to me to be a microcosm of all of the end times prophecies in ancient and modern scripture, spidering out to them in a fractal like way with the use of keywords that direct the reader to the related passages.

For those who are interested, I hope to provide the following documents that are related to the topic of this series within a few days.

The first is a copy of the dedicatory prayer with many of the major prophecy related keywords highlighted in yellow. Each of the keywords leads to one or more corresponding prophecies in other ancient and modern revelations that utilize the same keywords. It will be embedded kirtland ancient prophecies.

The second document is a a related spreadsheet containing each of the highlighted keywords with related snippets and live links to other related prophecies. It will be embedded here:  kirtland ancient prophecies unfinished.

Lastly, for those who enjoyed the ten part series about the Restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood titled Searching for the Holy Order and the 23 High Priests, I am providing the results of the additional research that I have been led to as a result of Karl Anderson,s book, “The Savior in Kirtland”. It will be embedded HERE when it is completed.

I am embedding these documents instead of making posts out of them partly because they are so closely associated with this topic and partly because I don’t want them easily searched and found on the internet.

Enjoy and keep watching


The Savior in Kirtland (Part Three)

February 13, 2013

The Savior in Kirtland
By Karl Anderson

Book Review and Critique by OWIW
OneWhoIsWatching [at] gmail.com
Part Three

In part two of this series I discussed, among other things, the fact that the “man of sin” prophecy from 2nd Thes. was literally fulfilled at the special conference at the Morley Farm when the Melchizedek Priesthood was restored for the first time.

Also mentioned was Karl’s research showing that at least 22 leaders of the LDS restoration movement saw or heard the voice of Christ.

In that post I also passionately disagree with Karl about the fact that there is a very important distinction between a real-time personal visitation and communication with Christ vs. an instructive vision showing Christ in a past or future event.

I also suggest that when the church is fully organized, only high priests have the heavens opened and see the Father and the Son. Such an event requires that the person is transfigured to prevent them from being destroyed by the glory of God.

Interestingly, other people can be in the presence of a transfigured person and not see the heavens open. Conversely, it appears that some people present in the Kirtland Temple saw angels while others did not.

Now we shall continue with the observations:

8- No Eye Witnesses of Christ During the Dedication

Perhaps one of the most shocking admissions given by Karl Anderson in the book is this one:

“It is generally assumed that the Savior appeared during the dedication of the Kirtland Temple, but no eyewitness accounts can be verified. One possible reference to an appearance of the Savior comes from a family tradition that cannot be documented with certainty. Two other references to the Savior’s appearance exist, but they are also problematic”

To fully comprehend and appreciate why this is such an incredible acknowledgement for Karl to make, lets review what the saints were expecting to happen in the solemn assembly.

First of all, Joseph Smith had promised the saints that all of the pure in heart would see Christ!

Joseph promised the newly called quorum of 12 apostles that “ALL who are prepared and are sufficiently pure to abide the presence of the Saviour will see him in the solemn assembly. (Pg. 225)

“all who are pure will see Christ… in solemn assembly”  (Pg. 242)

Similar statements to other saints are documented in the book (pages 129, 139, and 141.)

Hence, the saints went to the temple that day fully expecting hundreds of people to see Christ!

Secondly, the saints were fully expecting the temple to be personally accepted by either the Father or the Son during that dedicatory solemn assembly. Within the dedicatory prayer itself this hope was articulated:

..And now we ask thee, Holy Father, in the name of Jesus Christ, the Son of thy bosom, in whose name alone salvation can be administered to the children of men, we ask thee, O Lord, to accept of this house

Next, it was anticipated that a pentecostal experience similar to the one in the New Testament would result in Gods anointed servants being sealed with the endowment of power from on high so that they could go forth in POWER. Just as Peter and John went forth after their endowment of power after the day of Pentecost and started preaching with power and performing miracles, this very same things had been promised to the saints.

This is what they were expecting!

Joel had prophesied about the last great solemn assembly and acknowledged that the last great solemn assembly would “sanctify the congregation“. An obvious allusion to the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost.

Joel further identifies the last great solemn assembly as the time when the bridegroom goes forth out of his chamber and the bride comes forth out of her closet.

Section 38 had promised that the time would come “when men are endowed with power from on high and sent forth, all these things shall be gathered unto the bosom of the church.

This endowment was to begin the last great gathering in power.

Section 95 had promised the same thing:

Yea, verily I say unto you, I gave unto you a commandment that you should build a house, in the which house I design to endow those whom I have chosen with power from on high; For this is the promise of the Father unto you; therefore I command you to tarry, even as mine apostles at Jerusalem.”

Few people realize that prior to the dedication of the Kirtland Temple, the High Priests that had been “called and chosen” by the Lord, had met in the Temple to receive their anointing. They were then instructed that their anointing would be sealed with power from on high when they were endowed with power, in the temple.

Again, let us look at verbiage directly from the dedicatory prayer to confirm this:

“Let the anointing of thy ministers be sealed upon them with power from on high.

Let it be fulfilled upon them, as upon those on the day of Pentecost; let the gift of tongues be poured out upon thy people, even cloven tongues as of fire, and the interpretation thereof.

And let thy house be filled, as with a rushing mighty wind, with thy glory.

 Put upon thy servants the testimony of the covenant, that when they go out and proclaim thy word they may seal up the law, and prepare the hearts of thy saints for all those judgments thou art about to send, in thy wrath, upon the inhabitants of the earth, because of their transgressions, that thy people may not faint in the day of trouble.

Clearly, the promise was that those who had previously been ordained, called, chosen and anointed, were to have their anointing sealed with power from on high so that the last great gathering could commence in power.

This gathering, according to modern revelation would give God’s servants so much power, that no hand could prevent the work from going forth. (see section 1:5)

This endowment with power was to usher in the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times and begin the Marvelous Work.

To summarize, here is what the saints came to the Solemn Assembly expecting to happen:

  • Hundreds of People to See Christ
  • The Father or the Son to Appear and Accept the Temple
  • The Anointed High Priests to get ENDOWMENT of POWER
  • The Dispensation of the Fulness of Times Ushered in
  • The Marvelous Work to Begin with Ancient Records Coming Forth
  • God’s spirit to be poured out-Many to receive the baptism of Fire

With this contextual understanding, Karl’s confession that no credible documentation existed of anyone even seeing Christ is absolutely paramount.

I have so much respect for Karl Anderson for making the declaration that he did.

Granted, he didn’t explain why his statement was so profoundly significant, but nevertheless, he published the statement for the world to see.

Anyone who cares enough to do their homework about the purpose and importance of the solemn assembly and associated anticipation having to do with the completion of the temple and the dedicatory service, can find out for themselves why Karl’s observation is so earth shattering.

Or can they?

On page 249  Karl Anderson makes the following observation:

The Kirtland Temple endowment was central to the Lord’s purpose for bringing His Saints to Kirtland.

Understanding varies, however, regarding what the Lord meant when He promised such a blessing.”

It appears to me that Karl is suggesting that LDS general authorities and scholars cannot agree on what the promised blessing was that people were anticipating when they entered into the Solemn Assembly.

Karl then states:

The one thing historians seem to agree on is that the Kirtland endowment included a great spiritual outpouring- Pentecost.” (Pg 249)

I find the following statement astounding and revealing.

“Understanding varies..”

After decades of studying the history of the Kirtland era and the Kirtland Temple, Anderson does not appear to have a strong opinion of what the Kirtland Temple endowment was. Furthermore, he alludes to the fact that LDS general authorities and historians can’t seem to agree on what it was.

Curiously, Anderson doesn’t reference what the official stance of the church is on this most important topic, because the church does not have one.

Apparently, according to Karl, there are no general authorities or presidents of the church that have definitively and authoritatively declared what it was.

Much of the foundational understanding of the Utah Saints comes from the doctrinal instructions they received from Brigham Young and his associates. Young, who was a participant in many of the Kirtland meetings and in fact who had actually spoken in tongues in the Kirtland Temple was as confused on the issue as anyone.

Since Brigham admittedly had never been chosen and ordained as a High Priest and had never received the preparatory anointing on the 21st of January, let alone, the  endowment of power on March 27th, he could not speak with clarity or authority on what it was.

Interestingly, a footnote on page 142 alludes to the possibility that the preliminary holy anointing, is to see the Father and the Son.

The prophetic significance of the Holy “Anointing” is alluded to in the dedicatory prayer (and by Daniel and Isaiah)

“O Jehovah, have mercy upon this people, and as all men sin forgive the transgressions of thy people, and let them be blotted out forever.

35  Let the anointing of thy ministers be sealed upon them with power from on high.

36  Let it be fulfilled upon them, as upon those on the day of Pentecost; let the gift of tongues be poured out upon thy people, even cloven tongues as of fire, and the interpretation thereof.

37  And let thy house be filled, as with a rushing mighty wind, with thy glory.

38  Put upon thy servants the testimony of the covenant, that when they go out and proclaim thy word they may seal up the law, and prepare the hearts of thy saints for all those judgments thou art about to send, in thy wrath, upon the inhabitants of the earth, because of their transgressions, that thy people may not faint in the day of trouble.

39  And whatsoever city thy servants shall enter, and the people of that city receive their testimony, let thy peace and thy salvation be upon that city; that they may gather out of that city the righteous, that they may come forth to Zion, or to her stakes, the places of thine appointment, with songs of everlasting joy;

40  And until this be accomplished, let not thy judgments fall upon that city.

41  And whatsoever city thy servants shall enter, and the people of that city receive not the testimony of thy servants, and thy servants warn them to save themselves from this untoward generation, let it be upon that city according to that which thou hast spoken by the mouths of thy prophets.” (section 109 see also Dan 9:24 & Isa 10:27  )

Members of the church that don’t understand the doctrine of the 3rd watch probably assume that the prophecy above simply wasn’t fulfilled.

Sadly they don’t understand that it is still going to be fulfilled!!!

Those servants that got their anointing in the Kirtland Temple (that remained faithful) will still return, receive their endowment of power in the final solemn assembly and gather out the elect.

It appears from research I have done that the holy anointing that took in the Kirtland Temple on January 21st, (and possibly alluding to the event that took place behind the veil on April 3rd) had been the fulfillment of one of Daniels prophecies:

“Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.”

One of the great mysteries revealed by the Prophet Joel is that there was to be a preliminary solemn assembies that would  prepare and anoint God’s servants and portend that “the great day of the Lord is at hand” (Compare Joel 1:14-15 with Section 110:16 “The great and dreadful day of the Lord is near“)

Interestingly, religious historian and apologist for the Community of Christ, (previously RLDS Church), Richard Price, has made a similar admission about the solemn assembly held in the Kirtland Temple:

Christ told the Saints in the early Church, that He would appear to them in Kirtland Temple if they would qualify. Joseph Smith wrote,

‘You will see that the Lord commanded us, in Kirtland, to build an house of God, and establish a school for the prophets. This is the word of the Lord to us, and we must, yea, the Lord helping us, we will obey: as on conditions of our obedience he has promised us great things; yea, even a visit from the heavens to honor us with His own presence. We greatly fear before the Lord lest we should fail of this great honor, which our Master proposes to confer on us; we are seeking for humility and great faith lest we be ashamed in His presence (Church History 1:271).’

They were ashamed, for they never qualified, and Christ could not come in person to Kirtland Temple to appear to them. They did not develop the spirituality which would enable the Lord to bestow the endowment upon them, so the Lord could not bring Zion to the Church and the world at that time. For over a hundred years now we have had to wait for the time when the Saints would become righteous enough again so the Lord could bring them into His presence.

When the Lord comes to give the endowment and start moving the Church into Zion, I believe that Christ shall first appear in Kirtland Temple. That is why Kirtland Temple was built and preserved. It is a sacred, holy place; and one to which we should look for the beginning of Zion.” (Ref)

As you can see from the above statement, Richard Price also appears to believe that the prophesied endowment in the Kirtland Temple will yet take place at a future time, in the Kirtland Temple.

It is really quite exciting that remnants of people from different factions of the restoration movement are finally beginning to agree on the fact that the early Kirtland years did not result in the fulness going forth, rather, these events were laying a foundation for a future work.

I am not suggesting that there were not any spiritual manifestations in the Kirtland Temple.

I believe there were.

Clearly, the angel Peter appeared and accepted the temple.

Other lesser spiritual phenomena was reported by seemingly credible witnesses.

However, it appears that the Utah church history greatly embellishes what really took place and the major manifestations that were promised and expected did not happen.

Christ did not appear in that solemn assembly.

The baptism of fire did not take place,

the endowment of power was not bestowed upon the High Priests that were called, chosen and anointed.

Indeed, many of the saints left the dedication greatly disappointed.

Here is the testimony of Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer who was in attendance that day:

The great heavenly ‘visitation,’ which was alleged to have taken place in the temple at Kirtland, was a grand fizzle. The elders were assembled on the appointed day, which was promised would be a veritable day of Pentecost, but there was no visitation. No Peter, James and John; no Moses and Elias, put in an appearance. ‘I was in my seat on that occasion,’ says Mr. Whitmer, ‘and I know that the story sensationally circulated, and which is now on the records of the Utah Mormons as an actual happening, was nothing but a trumped up yarn…

Apostle William McLellin who was in attendance that day was about as impressed as David Whitmer was;

As to the endowment in Kirtland, I state positively, it was no endowment from God. Not only myself was not endowed but no other man of the five hundred who was present—except it was with wine!

9- Peter Accepts the Temple?

Clearly it was expected that Christ would personally accept the temple at the solemn assembly of the dedicatory pray and clearly that did not happen.

Most people that have dabbled in LDS church history are familiar with the fact that an angel was seen by some that entered into the temple during the solemn assembly. This angle sat between Frederick G. Williams and Joseph Smith Sr.

That story is commonly told however, we are normally left to wonder who the angel was and what he was doing in the Temple.

One of the juicy tidbits that Karl provides for us in his book is who the angel was and what he was doing.

On page 239 we are given the following information “a heavenly messenger who Joseph Smith said was Peter and who had ‘come to accept the dedicationwas seen entering the temple and sat between Frederick G Williams and Joseph Smith Sr.”

This amazing truth makes perfect sense to me because in previous blog posts I have suggested that the Melchizedek Priesthood that had been restored at the Morley Farm had been lost by the time the temple was finished and the solemn assembly and dedicatory prayer took place.

As we shall see as we continue in this series, the Lord did a dispensational bait and switch on the condemned church. Although they were expecting the dispensation of the Fulness of Times to be ushered in at the dedication solemn assembly, the Lord came in secret, seven days later, and ushered in the ancient dispensation of the Gospel of Abraham.

It only makes sense, therefore, that it was the patriarchal/evangelical priesthood that had been restored through Peter James and John that was presiding over the Kirtland Temple dedication and that Peter would be the one to accept the Kirtland Temple.

Had the Melchizedek Priesthood been presiding and the endowment of power from on high administered to God’s High Priest/Apostles, the assembly would probably have taken place in the upper chamber of the temple, rather than the lower chamber:

And let the lower part of the inner court be dedicated unto me for your sacrament offering, and for your preaching, and your fasting, and your praying, and the offering up of your most holy desires unto me, saith your Lord.

 And let the higher part of the inner court be dedicated unto me for the school of mine apostles, saith Son Ahman; or, in other words, Alphus; or, in other words, Omegus; even Jesus Christ your Lord.  Amen.” (Section 95:16-17)

It is no coincidence that the condemned church held few if any meetings in the upper court of the temple.

10- The restoration of an ancient Dispensation

Karl does a great job of showing that the Old Testament ordinance of anointing with oil was restored in the Kirtland Temple. I would add to that the historical evidence that Joseph Smith also restored the Old Testament ordinance of animal sacrifice.

This is a touchy subject that few LDS authors want to address.

Anderson is no exception.

Those two rituals of anointing and animal sacrifice were apparently done under the authority and direction of the Evangelical or Patriarchal priesthood that had been restored by Peter James and John!

Isaiah saw the events of the Kirtland temple which I have previously blogged about.

Here is the testimony of Wandle Mace regarding the restoring and actuating of temple sacrifices in the Kirtland Temple.

Wandle Mace suggested in his journal that animal sacrifices were actually performed in the Kirtland Temple:

The Quorum of the Twelve had been filled, but of the number selected one–Willard Richards–was in England and Joseph was instructing those present of that Quorum how they must proceed to prepare themselves, that they might ordain Willard Richards to the Apostleship when they should reach that country. Joseph told them to go to Kirtland and cleanse and purify a certain room in the temple, that they must kill a lamb and offer a sacrifice unto the Lord which should prepare them to ordain Willard Richard a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Sidney made some remarks, when Joseph spoke with great power and spirit, said he, ‘I know the law’. To a remark made by Heber C. Kimball he said, ‘It will be the sweetest smelling savor you ever smelled.’ [Journal of Wandle Mace, typescript, Harold B. Lee Library, BYU, pg. 32.]

I would suggest that needing to do an animal sacrifice in order to ordain an apostle, is certainly not consistent with the fulness of priesthood authority.

Clearly, the condemned church had slide back to a lesser priesthood protocol, even an ancient one.

Not only does the above quote verify that the Kirtland temple had to do with the ancient Evangelical-Patriarchal priesthood and the dispensation of Abraham, it also supports another hidden truth.

Some of the members of he quorum of the Twelve were not High Priests and they were not endowed with the holy anointing. They were not even in the running for what the High Priests were hoping for at that time.

The ministry they were sent on to foreign lands shortly after the defiling of the Kirtland Temple was not the final one spoken of about the 3rd watch during the Marvelous Work. They did not go forth in POWER with FULNESS of POWER.

Notice that members of the quorum of the 12 would be ordaining their fellow apostle, not Joseph or Sidney and notice that the priesthood that they would be ordaining him with was associated with animal sacrifice!

They were functioning under the Abrahamic evangelical/patriarchal priesthood that had been handed down by the fathers, not by the Melchizedek priesthood that the High Priests had been given via the voice of God from the heavens.

Notice this subtle reference that would be made regarding the quorum of the 12 after the Kirtland Temple period, in section 112:

“For unto you, the Twelve, and those, the First Presidency, who are appointed with you to be your counselors and your leaders, is the power of this priesthood given, for the last days and for the last time, in the which is the dispensation of the fulness of times.

31  Which power you hold, in connection with all those who have received a dispensation at any time from the beginning of the creation;

32  For verily I say unto you, the keys of the dispensation, which ye have received, have come down from the fathers, and last of all, being sent down from heaven unto you.

33  Verily I say unto you, behold how great is your calling.  Cleanse your hearts and your garments, lest the blood of this generation be required at your hands.

34  Be faithful until I come, for I come quickly; and my reward is with me to recompense every man according as his work shall be.  I am Alpha and Omega.  Amen.”

Clearly, the priesthood dispensation that the 12 apostles were functioning under as they took their ministry to foreign lands was the dispensation of the gospel of Abraham that had been handed down through the fathers! It was the evangelical priesthood that was restored by Peter and James and John having to do with the keys of the gospel of Abraham that were given to Joseph and Oliver in the Kirtland Temple!!!!

In our next and final post on this series we will briefly touch on the historical events having to do with how the “called” high priests became “chosen” and “anointed” prior to the solemn assembly, and some other interesting historicity brought to light by brother Anderson.

Keep Watching

 

 

Part Four

https://onewhoiswatching.wordpress.com/2013/02/24/the-savior-in-kirtland-part-four/


The Savior in Kirtland (Part Two)

February 10, 2013

The Savior in Kirtland
By Karl Anderson

Book Review and Critique by OWIW
OneWhoIsWatching [at] gmail.com
Part Two

In part one of this series, I discussed my first three observations about Karl Anderson’s book, The Savior in Kirtland. These three observations had to do with how the heavens were opened but eventually closed during the Kirtland era of the LDS restoration movement. This resulted in at least 22 people documented as seeing visions or visitations of the Savior in the Kirtland era, however, no credible documented visitation or visions ever happend after the Kirtland Temple was defiled. The Savior never appeared to anyone during the Nauvoo era of the LDS restoration era.

I also discussed how the scourge that was prophesied to take place in Kirtland is yet a future event, not one that has come and gone as is sometimes taught by people such as Karl Anderson.

Lastly, I discussed a remarkable quote by Karl Anderson about Sidney Rigdon wherein Anderson said:

Sidney’s phenomenal work for the Savior is recorded in many journals of those who joined the Church when it came to Kirtland, thus showing a successful fulfillment of his divine work” (pg 18)

Karl also concludes that “Sidney was one of the great leaders of hte Church, without whom the Church could not have been firmly established”

Now, we will cover my next 4-7 observations.

4- The Man of Sin was revealed in Fulfillment of 2 Thessalonians

In his new book, Karl continues to downplay the significance of the restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood at the special conference at the Morley Farm just like he did no his first book. He seems to agree with Brigham Young and the modern church that it only had to do with an “ordination” or “calling” to an “office” within the existing priesthood that Peter James and John had restored a few years earlier.

He rejects the characterization that Joseph, Lyman and others gave of the event; that the “Melchizedek priesthood” was literally being restored for the first time and not just the office of High Priest within the existing priesthood restored by Peter James and John as Brigham had speculated.

Karl’s stance on this comes as no surprise since it is the current theology taught by the LDS Church.

The other major event that took place at the special conference was the fulfilling of the prophecy in 2 Thes about the revealing of the Son of Perdition.

Regarding a short blurb about the special conference at the Morley Farm, Karl provides this amazing quote on page 76

During the meeting the power of the darkness were made manifest in a remarkable degree… Joseph.. Rebuked the spirit.. from the house upon which the spirit left.. and went outside, among the crowd of men standing near the door and made a swath among them several feet wide, throwing them violently to the ground. Joseph said this was the fulfillment of the scriptures where it says the man of sin should be revealed…”  pg76

This is really quite remarkable because it shows that the spiritual manifestation of Satan actually has physical power over physical bodies. This is consistent with the associated event of Satan literally throwing a 200 lb man across the room at the conference and other situations when people actually levitated because of evil powers.

The most significant thing about the above quote however is that it provides an exact time, place, event, and context for the literal fulfillment of the following prophecy.

“NOW we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition. Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”

Notice that the above prophecy by the apostle Paul directly links that end times apostasy with the Latter day Saints if Joseph’s declaration is true.

It also links the use of a temple with the apostate people that have had old Scratch revealed to them.

I have written about the fulfillment of the “man of Sin” prophecy in other posts and will not belabor that topic here.

5- Historical Revisionism about the Nauvoo Temple

On page 80 Karl quotes Brigham Young as saying

“..We completed a temple in Kirtland and in Nauvoo and did not the bells of hell roll all the time wer were building them?”

The statement from Brigham took place many years after Nauvoo, after the saints fled to Utah. It contradicted many other statements Brigham Young had made about the fact that the Nauvoo temple never being completed.

Karl knows better than that. Brigham did too.

In Brigham’s own journal he documents that the Nauvoo Temple was far from finished when the Saints fled Nauvoo. There is a wealth of credible historical information documenting the fact that the Nauvoo Temple was never completed.

I am really disappointed that Karl would knowingly provide a historical quote containing disinformation that will continue to perpetuate the myth that the Nauvoo temple was finished by the saints in the 1840’s.

6- At least 22 church leaders saw Christ or heard his voice. 11 can be identified by name  (pg 129)

Karls points out that a minimum of 22 people saw or heard the voice of Christ during the Kirtland era and at least 11 of them can be identified by name.

This is one of the greatest and most profound observations that Karl shares in his book. His years of research have made this most notable observation possible and I think those of us that are truly interested in the Kirtland period of church history and the Saviors personal involvement in it, are indebted to him for taking the time to do this research.

He further breaks the stats down as follows: 8 of the 11 that can be identified saw Christ while three of them heard his voice.

Those that were documented as having seen Christ

  • Joseph smith
  • Sidney rigdon
  • Lyman Wight
  • Harvey Whitlock
  • John Murdock
  • Zebedee Coltrin
  • Oliver Cowdery
  • Martin Harris

Those that heard his voice but did not see him

  • David Whitmer
  • Newel K. Whitney
  • Warren Snow

There are 12 additional documented but unidentified eye witnesses of Christ according to Karl. I believe we can guestimate who most of these people are by a profound discovery that Karl shares in his book. We will discuss this later in this book review.

7- There Is a Difference Between a Visitation and a Vision!

In a footnote on page 129 Karl makes the following observation and warning:

Some people try to draw a distinction between a vision and an appearance of Deity. This is difficult and perhaps unwise.”

I strongly beg to differ.

I think it is perhaps unwise to not draw a distinction.

I think the scriptures do make a contextual distinction between a vision, which often times shows past and future events as well as current ones, for instructive and faith promoting purposes, as opposed to the literal opening of the heavens for a literal, real time, visitation and communication with deity.

Why is this distinction or lack thereof important to people like Karl and me?

Why does he warn against making this distinction?

Why am I so passionate about the fact that there is a HUGE distinction that needs to be understood?

For one thing, it has to do with salvation and a person’s relationship with deity.

Secondly, because it provides a very important context for what was taking place in pre-1835 Kirtland events vs. post-1835 Kirtland events.

You see; my contention has been that the spiritual gifts and visitations being experienced during the time frame from 1831 to 1834 had to do with the restored “Church of Christ “and, in some cases, the restored, administrative Melchizedek Priesthood which was referred to as the   “Church of God“,  and the associated promises contained in the Book of Commandments.

The Melchizedek Priesthood that had been restored to the earth in June of 1831. Once this distinction is made, the D&C reads quite differently from section 52 on.

In my opinion, most of the spiritual endowments having to do with post-1834 events largely had to do with the “Church of the Latter day Saints” that was under condemnation and the instructions provided in the Doctrine and Covenants.

For those who are not aware, the name of the restored “Church of Christ” was changed in early 1834 to the “Church of the Latter Day Saints”. More on that later.

Among the many reasons that I feel the spiritual manifestations were of a lessor degree after the end of 1834, than prior to the end of 1834, is because the church in Kirtland and Nauvoo failed to live consecration and achieve temporal equality. The Lord had warned the saints that if they were not equal, He would withhold the abundance of the manifestations of the spirit:

Nevertheless, in your temporal things you shall be equal, and this not grudgingly, otherwise the abundance of the manifestation of the spirit shall be withheld.” (D&C 70:14)

Clearly, the saints had discontinued attempting to live the law of consecration by the time the Kirtland Temple was ready to be dedicated and were therefore not equal temporally. According to the word of God, they were not worthy to enjoy the full abundance of the manifestations of the spirit from then on.

Having the Heavens Opened and Conversing with the Father and the Son

I believe the act of literally opening the heavens and penetrating the veil of unbelief to transcend temporal time and gaze into eternity and converse with the Father and the Son requires a person to be transfigured.

This spiritual endowment is a Melchizedek Priesthood endowment and it is clearly different and distinct from many of the lesser endowments.

The Book of Moses informs us that one must be transfigured to see God, otherwise their physical bodies would wither and die.

But now mine own eyes have beheld God; but not my natural, but my spiritual eyes, for my natural eyes could not have beheld; for I should have withered and died in his presence; but his glory was upon me; and I beheld his face, for I was transfigured before him.”

Examples of this in Kirtland would be Joseph, Lyman and Harvey seeing the Father and the Son at the special conference when the Melchizedek priesthood was restored for the first time in 1831. During those visions, Joseph made a statement indicating that he had experienced a change in his body and would not even taste death if someone were to kill him. I believe he, Lyman and Harvey were all transfigured when they saw the Father and the Son. The above passage mandates that all three of them must have been transfigured.

Another example would be the experience that Joseph and Sidney had seeing and conversing with the Father and the Son which is now documented in section 76. Again, from the testimonies given of this experience, they were both quickened by the spirit and transfigured in order to behold the glory of God with their spiritual eyes without having their physical bodies destroyed.

Having a Visitation from Christ

I don’t think a personal, real time visitation and conversation with Christ (within the veil of mortality, without the presence of the glory of the Father) requires transfiguration, however, according the Joseph Smith, it does require a person who has become “pure”.

A perfect example of this is the appearance of Christ and three angels to Joseph and Oliver in the Kirtland Temple (section 110). I think the Melchizedek priesthood had been taken from the earth by the end of 1834 and that in 1836 Joseph and Oliver were functioning under the evangelical-patriarchal priesthood that Peter James and John had restored in 1829.

They did not penetrate the veil of unbelief to see the Father and the Son in eternity. Rather, Christ and three angels came into temporal time and into the temple behind the literal temple veil and conversed with Joseph and Oliver in this world, not in eternity.

Visions of the Past and Future that Provide Instruction

Carrying this scenario further, having a “vision” of Christ in a past historical setting, for example, seeing him on the Cross, or seeing him in a future, prophetic setting, for example seeing him riding on a white horse leading the armies of Israel in battle, in the future, etc., those types of visions are, in my opinion, lesser spiritual endowments than having either a- a literal, real time one on one conversation with Christ, or, b- gazing into eternity to see both Christ and the Father.

Speaking in Tongues

A forth division of spiritual endowment might be the visitation of angels and yet another one might be the speaking in tongues.

One might have the spirit fall upon them and begin speaking in tongues which would be a wonderful spiritual endowment, however, it probably is not in the category of having a vision of Christ and it definitely is not in the category of having a literal visitation and conversation with Christ, let alone, being transfigured to see Christ standing on the right hand of God.

Since the church has not enjoyed any of the above types of spiritual endowments for over one hundred years, it is easy to minimize any possible distinction between them and to also marginalize the importance of having them happen.

Christ categorically appears to ALL the pure in heart

I believe that one of the interesting things that Joseph taught, and that was documented but not emphasized in Karl’s book, is that the spiritual endowment of seeing Christ in the Kirtland Temple was not a random event.

Joseph promised the newly called quorum of 12 apostles that “ALL who are prepared and are sufficiently pure to abide the presence of the Saviour will see him in the solemn assembly. (Pg. 225)

all who are pure will see Christ… in solemn assembly”  (Pg. 242)

Similar statements to other saints are documented in the book (pages 129, 139, and 141.

I believe the scriptures and some of the passages documented in Karl ‘s book indicate that it is a the mandatory requirement to see God in the flesh in order to obtain the highest degree of glory. (I think many people who have died when the fulness of the gospel was not on the earth will be returned to the earth prior to the end of probation to have this endowment)

This is something that is greatly minimized in church commentaries and histories. One of the primary goals and commandments and ultimate fruits of the gospel is the seeking of the face of deity. This is not a random experience. It is not an optional possibility. It is ultimately required for salvation in the highest kingdom. It is incredibly important and it was a major underlying theme of temple theology, in fact, it was one of the main purposes of the temple is for seeing God and conversing with him. This is alluded to in section 124:

“And again, verily I say unto you, how shall your washings be acceptable unto me, except ye perform them in a house which you have built to my name?
38  For, for this cause I commanded Moses that he should build a tabernacle, that they should bear it with them in the wilderness, and to build a house in the land of promise, that those ordinances might be revealed which had been hid from before the world was.
39  Therefore, verily I say unto you, that your anointings, and your washings, and your baptisms for the dead, and your solemn assemblies, and your memorials for your sacrifices by the sons of Levi, and for your oracles in your most holy places wherein you receive conversations, and your statutes and judgments, for the beginning of the revelations and foundation of Zion, and for the glory, honor, and endowment of all her municipals, are ordained by the ordinance of my holy house, which my people are always commanded to build unto my holy name.
40  And verily I say unto you, let this house be built unto my name, that I may reveal mine ordinances therein unto my people;

I believe everyone going to the temple in Kirtland understood that they were, in a sense, being tested for purity.

Those that saw Christ, past the purity test.

Those that did not, needed to continue seeking his face after the temple experience. Some responded in a positive way while others became discouraged or skeptical or angry, etc.

There was a huge and very explicit distinction between the elders who saw the face of deity and those who did not.

This was clearly understood among all of the leaders of the church. According to section 67, the jealousies between the early brethren that were ordained High priests was significant. The jealousies had to do, in part, with who had seen God and who had not.

The natural tendency was for those who hadn’t seen God to be skeptical and jealous of those who did, and perhaps some of those who did see God, to be judgmental of those who had not, was horrendous. This amazing pressure resulted in doubts and jealousies between the brethren.

It is interesting to note that there were some brethren at the Morley Farm that got past by and were not ordained and did not see the Father and the Son, and yet, they were motivated to exercise greater faith in the future and eventually did get ordained to be a High Priest and to see the father and the Son.

One example of this was Zebedee Coltin. His testimony of the Father and the Son while in the school of the prophets is one of the most instructive and proves that the Father can in fact come through the veil and appear in this sphere.

Here is what section 67 says about those who became jealous and the promise that one can see God:

And again, verily I say unto you that it is your privilege, and a promise I give unto you that have been ordained unto this ministry, that inasmuch as you strip yourselves from jealousies and fears, and humble yourselves before me, for ye are not sufficiently humble, the veil shall be rent and you shall see me and know that I am—not with the carnal neither natural mind, but with the spiritual.”

The above passage is linking the jealousies and fears with the hope of seeing God.

It ends with the reminder that one must be quickened by the spirit to see God:

For no man has seen God at any time in the flesh, except quickened by the Spirit of God.”

That provides a second witness to the passage in Moses that one must receive a temporary change in order to see God without being destroyed.

Another distinction that Karl appears to have not noticed or to intentionally obscure, was that only those being called to be High Priests in Kirtland could see the Father and the Son. We shall explore this and other fascinating things as we continue.

Keep watching

 

 

Part Three
https://onewhoiswatching.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/the-savior-in-kirtland-part-three/


The Savior in Kirtland- Part One

February 9, 2013

The Savior in Kirtland
By Karl Anderson

Book Review and Critique by OWIW
OneWhoIsWatching [at] gmail.com
Part One

Many years ago after having acquired an insatiable interest in studying the gospel and visiting many of the LDS Church historical sites, Mrs. Watcher and I obtained a copy of “Joseph Smith’s Kirtland” by Karl Anderson.

We absolutely loved it and we resonated with Karl’s contagious passion about Kirtland’s foundational role in the later day restoration movement.

While visiting Kirtland during one of our pilgrimages one year, we got a little chummy with some kindred spirits that were serving missions at one of the historical sites and they shared with us a fascinating paper that told briefly about the special conference held in 1831 at the Morley Farm where the Melchizedek priesthood had been restored for the first time.

Despite the many years we had spent studying the history of the LDS church up to that point in time, the events that took place at the special conference of the church in 1831 at the Morley Farm and the significance thereof had not even made a blip on our radars.

The mysterious paper identified who the 23 High Priests were that were ordained at the special conference and graded each one of them as to their loyalty to the calling they had received.

Although the people who shared it with us were apparently sworn to secrecy and would not reveal who had written the paper, I have my reasons for believing that it was probably written by Karl Anderson.

Regardless of who did write it. I am very appreciate their efforts and I acknowledge that this paper has made a huge impact on my personal study because it directed my focus and the information that I began to dig up as a result of it, is astounding to me.

As I began constructing the major events that took place during this special conference by studying the journal entries that I could find from about 8 or 9 elders who took part in the incredible events, I began to have a lot of the questions answered that I had accumulated over the years. It motivated me to do a series of blog posts about my findings. I called it  “Searching for the Holy Order and the 23 High Priests”.

Although I only intended to do a few posts on the topic, the more I wrote, studied and pondered the significance of the restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood and the events that took place at the conference, the more I learned and the more compelled I felt to write about it. Eventually the series took on a life of it’s own and ended up being 10 rather lengthy installments.

Some of the different sub-topics relating to the restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood that I wrote about are listed below:

1 Joseph, Lyman and Harvey saw the Father and the Son and were transfigured to avoid being destroyed by the brightness of the Father

2 The Man of Sin Is Revealed in fulfillment of the Prophecy in 2 Thessalonians

3 The Melchizedek Priesthood Is Required to Establish Zion in Power

4 The Highest Order of the Priesthood Makes You Possessor of All Things

5 The Patriarchal Priesthood of Abraham that Administers Gospel Ordinances was Delivered by Peter James and John

6 Salvation is to Triumph Over Evil Spirits

7 The Oath & Covenant of the Priesthood Is Entered Into Through Baptism

8 The Gospel of the Dispensation of Abraham was ushered in instead of the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times- Patriarchal Law is Instituted

9 Three Orders of Priesthood

10 Three Different Churches Representing Three Different Priesthoods

Although I interpret many of the events during the Kirtland period much differently than Karl does, I have immense respect for the years of painstaking research that he has done in digging up lots of the history having to do with that time period and the religious history related to Kirtland. I feel as if I am indebted to him for bringing lots of historical documentation to my attention. In that respect I consider his efforts to be very inspired.

When I heard that he would be coming out with another book that documents every single known visitation of the Savior in Kirtland I was quite anxious to read it to see what other historical events he had dug up for me to digest.

Having now read his new book titled “The Savior in Kirtland“, I now realize that my search for the Holy Order and the 23 High Priests has resumed with a vengeance.

In Karl’s book, he unwittingly provides the rest of the story regarding the Lords CALLING of high priests. The bottom-line is that only a portion of the 23 high priests that were called at the Morley Farm ended up becoming “CALLED, CHOSEN AND FAITHFUL”.

The official ‘CHOOSING’ of many of the high priests that are to help usher in the Fulness of times took place on June 23 1834 and the official anointing of these brethren took place on January 21st 1836. The details of this amazing story are really quite incredible.

If I get the time to do it, I will do a follow up series called “Resuming My Search for the Holy Order and the 23 High Priests”.

For now, I feel compelled to prepare a short synopsis and critique of Karl’s new book by sharing the major observations that I had while reading it. The idea is to highlight some of his fascinating findings and give another perspective of the Kirtland era of LDS church history.

Before doing so, I want to say that in my humble opinion, every student of LDS church doctrine and history should have both of the books that Karl has written. Both of them would be on my list of the top 25 supplemental reading books that are extremely helpful in studying the LDS restoration movement and also the gospel.

As much as I love and appreciate Karl’s efforts, I have come to view him not only as a religious historian, but also as a religious apologist that is very selective about which events he chooses to include in his book.

I personally think the best policy for authors and historians to have is to simply just tell the cold hard facts and let the chips fall where they may, allowing each reader to form their own opinions about what it all means.

We simply disagree on some of these issues.

Observations

1- The Heavens During were Closing towards the end of the Kirtland Era of the Church

In the book Karl makes the statement that “people wonder why the Savior appeared so frequently in Kirtland…” ( I am paraphrasing the statement Karl made. I apologize for not making note of the page number and the exact quote. It was not until later in the book that I decided to make this critique and begin writing exact quotes and page numbers.   When I find that quote I’ll come back and update this post)

I was shocked when I read that statement. Why would people wonder why the Savior appeared to so many people, so many times in Kirtland?

I had never wondered that!

I had never known anyone that wondered that.

The church teaches us to believe in continuous revelation, hence why find multiple, continuous appearances so curious? I thought it was very natural and appropriate for the Savior to make lots of visits to people.

That is exactly what he did in Jerusalem after the crucifixion. He appeared to Mary, Saul, Stephen, the 12 apostles and others. He appeared to several people multiple times. He finally walked around for 40 days, seen by hundreds of people. Even after the 40 days he continued to appear to people.

As I pondered this strange statement from Karl it occurred to me that perhaps he was making that statement from the perspective that the Savior quit making known appearances after the Kirtland Era and he wanted to diffuse the issue.

In my opinion, the real question that myself and many people wonder about that study church history is “Why did the Savior appear to lots of people repeatedly in Kirtland and then NEVER ONCE APPEAR TO ANYONE DURING THE NAUVOO PERIOD?

I believe that is the real question that inquisitive gospel scholars and researchers wonder about.

After proposing his question, Karl then suggested why the Savior needed to make multiple appearances.

According to Karl, the Savior usually only appears for special events having to do with special ordinances, temple dedications, dispensations, spiritual endowments and the organizing of priesthood quorums.

According to Karl, since much of these types of things happened in the early stages of the Church in Kirtland, that is why the Savior appeared many times in Kirtland.

The problem with that line of thinking, in my opinion, is that similar things also supposedly happened in Nauvoo such as

  • The introduction of the ordinance of baptisms for the dead
  • The organization of the Holy Order of the Priesthood with the Council of 50
  • Temple dedications
  • A New and drastically different Temple Endowment
  • A Completely Different Doctrine and associated ritual pertaining to polygamous marriage that contradicted the previous one having to do with monogamous marriage

Virtually all of the events listed above would have been accompanied by appearances of Christ and angels had they happened in Kirtland. It seems to me that the Savior had many reasons to make appearances in Nauvoo if the official storyline is true and the events were authentic.

It seems to me that one of the lessons learned from the history of Kirtland is that the Lord was closing the heavens and no longer endowing any of the leaders with spiritual manifestations by the time the saints fled Kirtland and eventually arrived in Nauvoo.

As mentioned in countless posts, I have documented that fact that the Lord was quite upset with the saints during the Kirtland era. The saints were condemned for taking lightly the Book of Mormon and the revelations. This led to God withdrawing his spirit.

Encouraged by Neal Maxwell

In the book, Karl speaks of when Neal Maxwell encouraged him to write about Kirtland about 18 years ago, but cautioned him to “not be too quick to publish it..”

I believe it is because of many of the controversial events and the blatantly obvious fact that the heavens closed after Kirtland that Maxwell suggested that he take his time publishing it and that he limit it the content to the “Christ-centered teachings and evidences of the Savior in Kirtland and write about them”.

Nevertheless, it is difficult for someone to highlight the many continuous appearances of Christ in Kirtland without inadvertently bringing to light the categorical lack of appearances that took place in Nauvoo. Those who do a serious study of Nauvoo will notice a total void of Pentecostal experiences that the apostate church experienced in Nauvoo.

On a related topic, it is interesting how the New Testament church and the restored New Testament Church of the LDS restoration movement have the multiple visits of Christ in common and yet, the Book of Mormon seems to have a disproportionate abundance of appearances by angels compared to very few appearances by the Savior, other than in 3rd Nephi when Christ physically returned to the earth in North America. This seems to be a distinguishing factor between the gentile saints and the Book of Mormon saints and this distinction is actually mentioned in the Book of Mormon:

And it came to pass after my father had spoken these words he spake unto my brethren concerning the gospel which should be preached among the Jews, and also concerning the dwindling of the Jews in unbelief.  And after they had slain the Messiah, who should come, and after he had been slain he should rise from the dead, and should make himself manifest, by the Holy Ghost, unto the Gentiles.” 1 Nephi 10:11

It would appear as if the literal manifestation of Christ via the power of the Holy Ghost is something specifically pertaining to the way God deals with the Gentile portion of his saints as opposed to the House of Israel portion of his saints.

2- The Scourge in Kirtland is a Future Event!

On page two of his book, Karl repeats the contention made in his first book that the scourge that the Lord warned he had prepared for the city of Kirtland has now been lifted.

Apparently this prophetic announcement was uttered by Ezra Benson in 1979. I have written posts explaining why I believe the scriptures teach that the scourge is yet to take place. Since I think it is important for people to unwittingly inhabit the city of Kirtland before the scourge takes place, I will not provide the reasons for my contention in this review. I would simply encourage those who are interested in this topic to research this topic for themselves in the scriptures.

3- Sidney Rigdon Is One of the Great Prophets in the History of the World

I was impressed when I read Joseph Smith’s Kirtland that Karl was unusually complimentary towards Sidney Rigdon compared to most LDS historians and apologists. Additionally, in some interviews that followed the publishing of that book, Karl said that people needed to be more understanding and forgiving of Sidney.

I really appreciated Karl taking a compassionate look at Sidney back in the day. I noticed that Karl did the same thing in this new book.

In the midst of the niceties that Karl made regarding Rigdon, he then made the following declaration:

Sidney’s phenomenal work for the Savior is recorded in many journals of those who joined the Church when it came to Kirtland, thus showing a successful fulfillment of his divine work” (pg 18)

Karl also concludes that “Sidney was one of the great leaders of hte Church, without whom the Church could not have been firmly established”

While I appreciate Karl’s acknowledgement and sentiment, I feel very frustrated that he opted to continue keeping the “many journal” entries containing the testimonies of Sidney’s “phenomenal” work closed up and hidden from the general public.

I have known for a long time that the church has a lot of valuable and positive historical documentation about Sidney locked up and suppressed from the general public but it had not occurred to me that Karl also has accumulated much of this documentation. If that is the case, why wouldn’t Karl want to publish these faith promoting testimonies of Sidney’s contribution to the world?

I think the obvious answer to that question is that Karl and the church leaders don’t really want people to know the whole story about Sidney’s incredible and prophetic involvement. It is too controversial. It would bring to light just how wrong things went during the succession crisis.

Of course Sidney’s ultimate fulfillment of his work has to do with the 3rd watch.

As I have pointed out in other posts, the Lord had told Joseph that he and Oliver would bring to light an existing ministry. It was to be a separate ministry than Joseph’s. Clearly Joseph did bring this ministry to light and Sidney was one the primary minister of the separate ministry.

Section 90 provides clarity in differentiating Joseph’s ministry from Sidney’s. It clarifies that the ministries that Joseph and Sidney will have during the 3rd watch will be closely inter-related but separate and distinct

Notice in that section how both ministries are clearly referred to as distinct and separate ministries even though they are interrelated.

“through your administration [Joseph] the keys of the school of the prophets, which I have commanded to be organized; That thereby they[Sidney and Frederick] may be perfected in their ministry for the salvation of Zion, and of the nations of Israel, and of the Gentiles, as many as will believe”

The fact that Sidney has been marginalized by most LDS historians and authorities will not change the fact that he is going to return and complete his ministry.

It has been said that “history is written by the winners..” When the church voted Sidney out of the first presidency and Brigham Young and the Twelve into it, it gave Brigham control of the official dairy and histories of the church. Significant alterations took place after that. The sanitized history of the church has been revised by the winners that wrested the kingdom, along with the contemporary historians who continue to write about these issues.

Sidney did do an incredible preparatory work during that time but was eventually, largely written out of the history of the church.

It is extremely unfortunate that many contemporary LDS writers continue to keep the truth of Sidney’s involvement obscured. I give Karl credit for generally having a positive spin about Sidney, nevertheless, it would have been so edifying and revealing if Karl had devoted at least one full chapter to bringing to light the many suppressed journal entries about Sidney’s true involvement that have been kept hidden for four generations.

It would be fun to read about the miracles and sermons and the faith promoting debates with critics that Sidney was involved with and the hand he had in watching over Joseph and guiding the church, etc.

In the next installment of this series, we will discuss why Karl believes it is not necessarily wise to distinguish between visions and personal appearances of Christ and why I passionately disagree. We will also discuss the fact that Karl has documented at least 22 people that personally saw Christ in Kirtland and that 11 of them can be specifically identified.

Keep Watching