Synthesis and conclusion of the survey work carried out by Amar GOUDJIL
European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance
Mamer, 06th June 2021.

(translation from French: Marie De Plume)

Picture from

For the past few months, hundreds of amateur videos have been popping up all over social media
featuring people who have visibly become electromagnetic following vaccination.

After many questions were raised by a number of our members about this “supposed”
electromagnetic effect in vaccinated subjects, our association decided to take a concrete interest in
this intriguing subject.

This survey, of a purely statistical and sociological nature, on this supposed electromagnetic effect,
which is the subject of this report, raises at least three important questions:

  1. Is it true that people show an electromagnetic effect after vaccination?
  2. If so, is it true that only vaccinated individuals show this effect?
  3. What is actually injected into individuals under the qualification of vaccine that causes this

    To try to answer these questions, the survey was entrusted to Mr. Amar GOUDJIL, treasurer of the
    association and member in charge of demographic and sociological issues.

    Presentation of the survey parameters:

    For the purpose of a fast-tracked completion, it was decided:

     That a panel of 200 individuals living or working in Luxembourg would be interviewed.

     That this panel would be divided into 2 groups. The first would be composed of 100 individuals
    vaccinated in Luxembourg and the second of 100 unvaccinated individuals for comparison

     That each of these groups should have 50 women and 50 men.

     That only active individuals would be selected to participate in the study due to the fact that they
    are much more constrained to vaccination than inactive individuals.

     That the location of the study would be the Belle-Étoile shopping centre and the route d’Arlon in

     That the variables retained would therefore be sex, age, occupation, number of injections, the
    pharmaceutical origin of the injections, the date of the injections, the magnetic attraction, the
    emission-reception of an electric field and the town of residence of the respondent.

     It should also be noted that for practical reasons, only people wearing short-sleeved or sleeveless
    clothing would be interviewed.

    Presentation of the method of approach and execution:

     The interviewer introduces himself/herself to the individuals, presents the association and then
    introduces the survey.

    “Hello Madam or Sir, sorry to bother you but my name is Amar GOUDJIL, I work for the European
    Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV) and I am currently carrying out a statistical and anonymous
    survey on vaccinated and non-vaccinated people living in Luxembourg.” … “It’s a survey about
    information according to which vaccinated people show electromagnetic effects and at EFVV, we are
    trying to find out what the observed reality is”.

     The interviewer then asks the respondents if they would be willing to participate in the survey on
    a voluntary basis.

    “Would you please spare a few minutes and would you be interested in participating in our survey? “
     The interviewer then explains the interests of the survey to the interviewees and introduces the
    individuals to the subject by presenting them with a magnet which he sticks, by magnetic effect,
    to a metallic object (post, car, etc.). He then explained that magnets do not adhere to humans
    and that they only adhere to metallic objects, but that information had been received claiming
    that vaccinated people generated an attraction to the magnet because they had been vaccinated.

     The interviewer then asks the respondent if he or she is willing to play the game and apply the
    magnet to the place where he or she was injected.

     When the magnet sticks to the skin on the shoulder, the interviewer then asks the respondent to
    stick the magnet on the other shoulder.

     The interviewer then asks the respondent if he or she is willing to have an electric and magnetic
    field tester (Meterk brand, model MK54) be placed on the shoulders, explaining that information
    had also been reported to our association that vaccinated people also generate electric fields.

     The interviewer continues the discussion and continues to respond, as far as possible, to
    interviewees who are interested in the conducted experiment and in the results of the survey.

    Summary presentation of the results for the study week from 1 June to 5 June 2021:
     Only 30 vaccinated and 30 unvaccinated people were finally interviewed while the target was to
    interview 100 for the first group and 100 for the second.

     The condition of gender distribution was met. In each group, 15 women and 15 men were

     In the non-vaccinated group, out of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people
    showing attraction to the magnet was 0 (zero). Therefore the experiment ended there for this

     In the vaccinated group, on the other hand, 29 of the 30 individuals interviewed showed
    attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adhered to their skin without difficulty.

     Of these same 29 individuals, 22 have the magnet adhering to only one shoulder and only to the
    injection area. These 22 individuals are those who received only one injection. The other 7
    people in this same group have the magnet adhering on both shoulders.

     In this group, known as the group of vaccinated people living or working in Luxembourg, it
    appears that:
  • 17 received at least one injection from Pfizer
  • 7 received at least one injection from Astra Zeneca
  • 3 received at least one injection from the Moderna laboratory
  • 3 received the single injection from Johnson & Johnson
  • 6 received both Pfizer injections
  • 1 received the 2 injections from Astra Zeneca
  • 1 received the 2 injections from Moderna

     Two of the individuals in this group, a nurse working at the CHL who was one of the first to
    be vaccinated, and a financial analyst, showed totally abnormal electric field emissions. In the
    case of the nurse, a video was even made showing the values emitted by the tester in the
    area around the left shoulder. For the analyst, the values emitted by the tester were
    approximately the same, but the individual abruptly ended his participation.

     Out of the 30 respondents in the vaccinated group, 29 reside or work in Strassen. Only 1 lives
    in Metz but works in Strassen.

     It seems that people who were vaccinated earlier within the government vaccination
    programme are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more
    recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds better than in freshly vaccinated people.
    More precise measurements should be taken in relation to this last finding.

     Note: The exercise being totally destabilising for the respondents, at no point were they
    asked to apply the magnet to any area other than the shoulders. It would have been very
    interesting to know whether the magnet also adhered to the neck, chest, forehead or leg
    areas and whether other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhered.


     It was found that vaccinated individuals do give off an electromagnetic field and that the
    earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the stronger the field they gave off. This sensation
    and appraisal, which is purely a tactile experience when the shoulder magnet is applied and
    removed, should be verified much more accurately with much more precise equipment.

     It was extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play along with this extremely
    disorienting experiment.

     Individuals are interested in the experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the
    magnet clings onto their skin, they become dubious at first, then they suddenly become cold.
    Some of them even become extremely nervous, even completely shocked.

     People sincerely wonder how a magnet can stick to their skin as easily as it sticks to a metal

     They ask for an explanation and the investigator reassures them that there must be an
    explanation. They are referred back to the doctor who advised them to get an injection.

     One lady even cried and told me that she did not want to be vaccinated but was forced to
    because her employer said she had to because she works in contact with customers.

     In the conversations, it emerged that people do not even vaccinate for medical or health
    reasons, out of conviction or fear of the disease but often in the hope of returning to a
    normal life and being able to travel freely again.

     During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying afterwards that they are
    taken as hostages. Many acknowledge that this injection is non-consensual and that at no
    time were they given rational explanations, even if only from the point of view of the benefitrisk balance. After reflection and discussion, they then describe this act as: “mistake,
    madness, loophole, solution, or even blackmail”.

    These exact terms were used frequently.

    Here again, a psychosocial investigation should be conducted into the real motivations that
    led the vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected. Ideally, all conversations with the
    vaccinated would be recorded and filmed for further analysis.

     The survey is stopped for reasons of conscience and morals because the investigator is no
    longer able to cope with the helplessness of people whose faces become petrified when they
    realise that they have been injected with a substance of which they know nothing.

    The investigator, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past,
    is very uncomfortable with these people who are wondering what is happening to them.
    People become pale, white, nervous, put a hand to their forehead or cross their arms and
    pinch their bottom lip. Some sweat from their hands as they are seen wiping them on their
    hips or thighs.

    These effects and expressions usually occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or really
    measurable tension.

    For the respondents, these uncontrolled physical manifestations are indicative of a deep
    malaise when they realise afterwards that they may have done something irreparable.

    The act of vaccination being an irreversible act.

    To the question, is it true that people present an electromagnetic effect after having
    undergone at least one act of vaccination, the answer is affirmative and yes, indeed,
    individuals do become electromagnetic on the injection zone at least.

    To the question of what is injected into individuals that causes this effect, we reply that it is
    up to the governments and authorities responsible for the health of Luxembourgers to
    answer this question, as they are the ones who took the heavy decision to vaccinate the

    Here we will not answer for the responsibility of each party, but it is certain that if
    paramagnetic nanoparticles (nanocarriers or magnetic beads) have entered the composition
    of these so-called vaccines, it is a safe bet that we will very quickly hear about an
    unprecedented health disaster.

    It is now the responsibility of toxicologists and pharmacologists to discover the origins and
    causes of these attractive effects on vaccinated subjects, and it is the responsibility of the
    guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country to very quickly demand the opening of
    an enquiry into the exact and real composiSon of these so-called vaccines.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: