“Unanimous Consent”: According to Lorraine Day, the Noahide Law was Passed through Deception

This is very disturbing.

According to Lorraine Day and her husband, Bill Dannemeyer, who is an ex-Congressman, the Noahide Law was passed through deception by four congressional traitors who held a secret vote after her husband and the other congressmen were told to go home.

This law allows the government to execute people for idolatry. Guess what counts as idolatry?

Her husband wrote an article titled “Now the Government can Legally Kill Christians

Below is a video of an interview with Lorraine.

BTW, she points out that Christianity began in the Garden of Eden.

Of course we already know that because of the JST of the Bible but she points out that even the King James Version of the Bible proves it!

The scripture she uses will surprise you.

The information contained in the video gives clarity and greater detail to the following passage:

“…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.”

5 Responses to “Unanimous Consent”: According to Lorraine Day, the Noahide Law was Passed through Deception

  1. ric says:

    Watcher, does this mean we have to revaluate the Protocol of the Elders of Zion?

  2. Ric Francom says:

    Yes, that is what I mean. It has been years and years since I learned about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and I haven’t taken it seriously because it is heavily debunked by so many sources. The main source was Cleon Skousen, he pretty much said it was a fabrication so I pretty much dismissed it from that point on. I guess I shouldn’t put my trust in the arm of flesh even when it comes to Skousen. There are so many lies posing as history like the phony sugar-coated history of the church we learned in Sunday School, primary and seminary, then I’m thinking of the lies about Islam being the “religion of peace”, (a piece of you here and a piece of you there), these are just two examples of history being sanitized and white-washed (no thanks to Daniel Petersen’s lying about how innocuous Islam is). Now I’ve got to re-research this so-called Jewish conspiracy again in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to see if there is any merit to its truthfulness and to see if I should rate it in my mind with the previous phony histories. Gad, it’s like what you say—“everything is rigged.” Thanks for your insights!

    • I remember that when I first read the protocols it rang true to me because it seemed to line up with so many other things.

      I then read many of the debunking articles that derail people from believing. The same was true when I read the Jesuit Blood Oath, lots of people trying to discredit it.

      Obviously if information like those documents come to light, the dark forces are going to try to debunk.

      It has probably been over a decade since I read Protocols and cannot even remember most of the details… I need to re-read it now and see if it rings true again.

      Thanks for reminding me about it.

      • Ben says:

        The Jesuit Blood Oath? Protocols of the Elders of Zion? I hadn’t heard of these before. I did a quick search-and-read on the Blood Oath and found an unsurprising, yet still shocking similarity to the pre-90’s temple penalties.

        I have been reading this blog and doing my own searching for a number of years now, and as a long time active and full participant in the LDS tradition, and, more recently, a believer in the doctrine of the watches, I, at times, struggle to reconcile Satan’s oaths and penalties and the “endowment” with the kind of experiences many are claiming on Sunday when they talk of the peace, wonderful experiences and even seemingly divine manifestations.

        I am convinced it has to do with blindness (confirmation bias) and “Other spirits”, but the power of their belief in the temple is incredible and on occasion leads me into internal conflict over my more recently established, and significantly less popular beliefs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: